Often when searching pm for a solution I'll discover old nodes with old solutions
Often, I enjoy finding old threads about current problems. I've had the experience of the old thread shedding light on why something or some solution evolved the way it did. Also, older data has provided workarounds for 'modern' and broken modules or applications.
Should a good monk help his fellows by responding to the old discussion with updated information or a link to the newer discussion?
Generally I think "Yes" is the right answer here. Occasionally you'll see that happen Q&A or other areas. In practice it'll never happen methodically, since it's not somehow encouraged by discussion board designs (Everything included.) It's a "here and now" moving window of Today's Questions mostly.
It would be wonderful to find a workable paradigm for open source version control on "Know How".
Updating 'old' threads might be a stab at that, including change, date and author history.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||