The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
It's hard to imagine any role that Perl couldn't
fill, with the proper adjustment. But how many different
people with how many different needs can "clean Perl up"
before it becomes just another programming language? If you
consult Programming Perl, you'll
see that Perl was consciously designed as a language that
would allow you to program in ways inappropriate "for
complex problems demanding complex data structures." The
idea was that Perl would intentionally violate rules known
to be prudent,
if not necessary, for large projects, thus allowing small
jobs to be handled with unprecedented ease.
Currently, talented and careful programmers can do almost anything in Perl. That's not good enough for all situations; some projects require a language like Java, so that managers can coax usable code out of any idiot who can use a keyboard. (By the way, I love Java and use it every day :-) Now managers are salivating over all the great code in CPAN and all the talented programmers who want to use Perl.
Let's leave it up to the people who understand Perl the best -- the developers -- to decide whose demands can be met without turning Perl into one of those "industrial-strength languages" that "make it equally difficult to do almost everything."
Will we ever throw another script away? In reply to RE: why i may have to leave perl...
by grackle
|
|