A) I don't think you can call any language 'object oriented'. OO is a
design style, not a function of the language. You can write OO code in C
and write procedural code in java. Granted in general it's much easier to
write OO in java and procedural in C, but it doesn't make C a 'procedural
language' or java an OO language.
A) Oh, I think you can. An OO language is one that supports object oriented
semantics at the language level. Java does, C does not. I will agree that
one can program in either an OO or procedural style in either language, but
that doesn't make Java more procedural nor C more OO.
C) I also agree that Java's meaningful differences from Perl have nothing to
do with OO. But 'static' vs 'dynamic', comes to mind.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|