comment on

FYI, it isn't "another" node, just the same node with the ownership and content changed and approval removed. Go ahead and try to approve it, you can't. Only janitors can approve reaped nodes, and that certainly doesn't happen often.

Like chromatic, I wonder why you think reaped nodes should be approved. Please explain your thinking in case we are overlooking something or it illustrates some confusion others might share and/or that we might address with site or documentation changes.

Thanks,

- tye

In reply to Re: Auto NodeReaper Approval (why?) by tye
in thread Auto NodeReaper Approval by Paulster2

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot
	PerlMonks