![]() |
|
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I would like to hear what a DB expert would say about this. My intuition is that my query, even if it might use quite a bit of joins, it still does everything using indexes - while your 'HAVING' clause needs to count things and than filter and for big data set shall be inefficient. But I am no expert here.
In reply to Re^2: DBIx::Class and many-to-many searching
by zby
|
|