Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

In an attempt to spark a better idea, what if we consider borrowing an idea from (Heaven help me) /.? Namely, the ability to flag nodes with certain attributes, such as "Insightful," "Funny,", "Underrated," "Overrated," "Interesting," "FAQ", and so on?

If pursued, I'd see this as:

  • Being a Level Power (say Level 6 or 7, to provide cues to other senior members that this may be a node needing extra attention).

    The idea here being that it should only be available to folks who've been around long enough to fairly assess the "properties" of a node.

  • Briefly summarized in Index pages underneath the posters name. For example:

    Choose a maximum for Rep
    on May 24, 2001 at 17:37
    2 replies by lemming
    Interesting

    Note that this only requires the addition of a <BR> tag and a description.

  • Summarized in threaded views after the post date.

    For example:

    Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
    by chipmunk on May 24, 2001 at 18:34, Insightful, Underrated

    (Apologies for to chipmunk for borrowing his node for example purposes. No offense intended.)

  • Specifically summarized only to the poster when viewed in its own window, again in the header, e.g.:

    Re: Re: Choose a maximum for Rep

    by chipmunk on May 24, 2001 at 20:28
    Insightful (3), Underrated (2)
  • If done properly, this add more information about the community's reaction to a node, as well as more drugs for the addicted.

    I realize that this is a very ambitious proposal, one needing further analysis and a lot of work to implement. However, it might be a workable solution.

    Note: Please realize that I offer this as a possible solution to a problem that I do not believe exists. I do not think the current voting system is broken. I simply think it's not being used wisely.

    Thoughts? Feedback?

    --f


    In reply to Re: Choose a maximum for Rep by footpad
    in thread Choose a maximum for Rep by lemming

    Title:
    Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
    and:  <code> code here </code>
    to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



    • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
    • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
      <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
    • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
    • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Domain Nodelet?
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2023-02-07 18:03 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:







      Results (40 votes). Check out past polls.

      Notices?