comment on

It both fascinates and baffles me that you seem to believe that it is your place to assess the validity of how people spend their time on projects. Between this and dumping on the idea of improving documentation, it's like you fancy yourself a self-appointed supervisor of Perl projects, and you think everyone must do only those things you consider valid.

What is it that gives you this idea?

And to the others reading this thread, let me make this clear: educated_foo's tactics don't get anything useful done.

xoxo,
Andy

In reply to Re^10: The current state of Perl6 by petdance
in thread The current state of Perl6 by Anonymous Monk

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks