The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> certainly (at least for me) * NOT * lambda languages.
Crockford gave a definition you only give a opinionated non-definition. In contrast see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-class_function#Comparison for a catalog of criterias. > Languages that make extensive use of assignments and non-pure functions Perl is a multi-paradigm language, supporting features of one paradigm doesn't mean excluding features of an other one. > I don't want to start a long thread here Neither me.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^6: The first lambda language to go mainstream ?
by LanX
|
|