Re: Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious

[Anonymous Monk]

I worked for many years with an on-line store system that was built using CGI::Application and it worked just fine. Booked hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales every month without a hitch. Both of the frameworks that you mention have plenty of success stories, so, really, it just comes down to your preference. Take a few days to build-out a small subset of your project in each of them and see which one feels better to your sensibilities. You're not going to "make a wrong decision" either way.

[marto]

"are there advantages to one over the other? ... What has your experience been? or put another way, what made you choose one over the other?"

None of your claimed experience or your post answers any of this.

[LanX]

I was told that more and more news sites start using bots to write articles.

Is it that far fetched that they trained with a MikeBot here, repeating the same drivel over and over? 🤔

Edit

On second thought that's not likely, bots learn over time and show progress.

[perlfan]

Your answer is helpful and germane. Maybe just not German.

You're not going to "make a wrong decision" either way.

Only if that decision is to go lock, stock, and barrel on the framework koolaid; whatever one chooses. Just need to properly separate the code. A good experiment for this (and deciding, frankly) would be to ensure your application runs in both frameworks. For nostalgia, throw in CGI::Application since that separation of code is easy in that framework also.

[marto]

"Your answer is helpful and germane. Maybe just not German."

No, the 'reply' isn't an answer. It doesn't address any of the points OP specifically asked for advice on, and you are replying to one of the sites worst trolls.

[perlfan]

>troll?

I thought Anonymous Monk was a catch all like /.'s Anonymous Coward. I am not familiar with the past, but I have not seen any recent responses being that of a troll.