Re: How to change these small one-liners into Perl6 code?
by moritz (Cardinal) on Dec 23, 2012 at 08:22 UTC
|
print '218'.subst(rx/^18/, 3);
2: this is supposed to work with substr-rw, but doesn't with current rakudo.
3: Sorry, I don't even understand what this code does in Perl 5. Modifying and using a variable in the same statement is very detrimal for readability.
4: labels and goto aren't implemented in Rakudo. You can use prompt, or for lines() { } (since lines() is a lazy list, it doesn't read all the lines upfront; this was broken in some earlier Rakudo versions, but should be fine in the 2012-12 and possibly the 2012-11 releases).
I can recommend hanging out in the #perl6 IRC channel, we try to be helpful and friendly (and we succeed most of the time :-).
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
First, thank you very much.
>1: print '218'.subst(rx/^18/, 3);
Great, this works for me.
It was a real effort for me to figure out how "s///r" works in Perl6... It turned out to have a completely different syntax, but I do miss the Perl5's version: it's so concise, and since it is like a mother language, it can't be obfuscated anyway. I hope Perl6 can still allow the Perl5's sed syntax, conforming to TMTOWTDI. :-)
>2: this is supposed to work with substr-rw, but doesn't with current rakudo.
I see.
>3: Sorry, I don't even understand what this code does in Perl 5. Modifying and using a variable in the same statement is very detrimal for readability.
I will explain these code in the next post.
>4: labels and goto aren't implemented in Rakudo. You can use prompt, or for lines() { } (since lines() is a lazy list, it doesn't read all the lines upfront; this was broken in some earlier Rakudo versions, but should be fine in the 2012-12 and possibly the 2012-11 releases).
I am using version 2012-11, and it is slurping. but I wonder is the parentheses with "lines()" mandatory? It doesn't seem like Perl's style though?
>I can recommend hanging out in the #perl6 IRC channel, we try to be helpful and friendly (and we succeed most of the time :-).
I will try that.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
I was simply translating my Perl5 one-liners on ProjectEuler into Perl6's code.
These are all on its first problem:
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are multiples of 3 or
+ 5, we get 3, 5, 6 and 9. The sum of these multiples is 23.
Find the sum of all the multiples of 3 or 5 below 1000.
(I generalized this to:
below 10**$n for code #1 and #2,
or below $N for code #3)
This is my fastest solution in Perl5: (not in the code #1..4 above)
perl5 -e '$n=3;print 2,3x--$n,1 .6x$n+2'
The following is the origin of code #1, which works beyond the limit of 64 bit int, since it uses string op:
$n=3;print 2,(3x--$n.1 .6x--$n.8)=~s/^18/3/r
This is the origin of code #2:
$n=3;$_=2 .3x--$n.1 .6x$n;substr($_,-1)+=2;print
So code #3 is a more general solution for $N which is typically not an integer exponentiation of 10:
map{$s+=int$_*($i=abs int 999/$_)*++$i/2}(3,5,-15);print$s
They all give the same result: 233168 for $n=3, but work for other $n as well. | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
https://github.com/perl6/perl6-examples/tree/master/euler should interest you.
Five solutions have been added to this repo over the last 4 years. The latest one was added 18 days ago:
say [+] grep * %% (3|5), ^1000;
This means "say the sum of numbers that are divisible by 3 or 5 in the range zero up to (but not including) 1000".
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
Re: How to change these small one-liners into Perl6 code?
by ABCXYZ (Novice) on Dec 23, 2012 at 01:44 UTC
|
I've made #4 work finally:
while prompt qq/Please input a number (>1):\n/ -> $_ {
say $_;
}
A lot of unexpected things:
1. For some reason, Rakudo does not recognize the "LOOP:" construct, I just can't use "goto LOOP" to jump to a label.
2. The simple "while(<>){}" idiom doesn't work anymore. Though I've heard that "for =<> {}" is one alternative, but it seems that Rakudo doesn't support it yet.
3. The compiler suggest me to use "lines()" instead of "while(<>)", but "lines()" slurps all the input, so I can't input line by line, luckily there is a "prompt" function instead.
4. Since "while(<>){}" does not work, the implicit variable is not assigned, so I have to explicitly assign it by: "-> $_".
5. For some reason, bare function "chomp" and "say" does not work any more, I have to pass the parameter "$_" explicitly.
6. But the chomp function is not necessary anymore, the NL is automatically chomped. This sounds like the "perl5 -l" option, I guess we will need a "perl6 -L" option to do the inverse in the future?
I am surprised that Perl6 is so much different from Perl5.
But the code does become much shorter and clearer, at least from this example. | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
> 1. For some reason, Rakudo does not recognize the "LOOP:" construct, I just can't use "goto LOOP" to jump to a label.
loop is a control keyword in perl6 replacing c-style For Loops, IIRC to avoid the confusion with Foreach Loops.
You can't use a keyword as a label.
| [reply] |
|
>> 1. For some reason, Rakudo does not recognize the "LOOP:" construct, I just can't use "goto LOOP" to jump to a label.
>loop is a control keyword in perl6 replacing c-style For Loops, IIRC to avoid the confusion with Foreach Loops.
>You can't use a keyword as a label.
But I was using "LOOP:" instead of "loop", the interpreter should have distinguished them.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
|