Re^10: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).

Aaah, ok. Misunderstanding on my part. I read you to say that unless you delete the main file, the data persists.

--MidLifeXis

Comment on Re^10: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround). by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 22, 2013 at 15:45 UTC
I read you to say that unless you delete the main file, the data persists. I did :) (I'm guessing were at cross-purposes here?) The problem is; I shouldn't have to delete a file, (any file), when I've asked for an in-memory db. If they have a need to create a file for an in-memory db -- that was a surprise -- they should delete it afterwards. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^12: threads::shared seems to kill performance (Workaround). by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Jul 22, 2013 at 15:47 UTC
The problem is; I* shouldn't have to delete a file, (any file), when I've asked for an in-memory db.* If they have a need to create a file for an in-memory db -- that was a surprise -- they should delete it afterwards. Agree 100% :-) --MidLifeXis	[reply]