http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1112860


in reply to Re^3: What 'should' a professional PERL programmer know?
in thread What 'should' a professional PERL programmer know?

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What 'should' a professional PERL programmer know?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 10, 2015 at 17:06 UTC
    BrowserUK, your bitter personal animosity towards me (and studious unwillingness to take downvote-responsibility for any such commentary),

    Once again. It wasn't me. (Ask tye, I'm sure he'll confirm that!)

    Feel free to downvote me as much as you want. That is the point of the voting system.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^5: What 'should' a professional PERL programmer know?
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 10, 2015 at 15:59 UTC
    I just stumbled over worst nodes where you are completely dominating with 50% of all entries! °

    I have to say that's really not fair, you should also give others the chance to gain merits for spreading dangerous nonsense.

    Cheers Rolf

    PS: Je suis Charlie!

    °) IIRC that already for years now. Impressive!