A day or two ago, I considered "Reaped: Re^2: Parallel::ForkManager or something like that?" for reaping (it was an anonymous duplicate that had been reposted after the user logged in). At the time it had one reply: I considered this for reparenting to the non-anonymous duplicate "Re^2: Parallel::ForkManager or something like that?".
The Reparent consideration has gone ahead: no problems there.
The Reap consideration is still in "Nodes To Consider": it now shows 3 replies. However, when following the links in "Nodes To Consider", and also looking at the entire thread ("Parallel::ForkManager or something like that?"), there are zero replies.
The non-anonymous duplicate "Re^2: Parallel::ForkManager or something like that?" has two direct (Re^3) replies and six total replies (various Re^3, Re^4 and Re^5 posts).
There's clearly a discrepancy between the count of reported and actual replies. I'm out of guesses as to how this discrepancy might have occurred.
— Ken
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count
by chacham (Prior) on Aug 15, 2017 at 06:21 UTC | |
by chacham (Prior) on Aug 15, 2017 at 06:24 UTC | |
by choroba (Cardinal) on Aug 15, 2017 at 11:27 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 15, 2017 at 12:57 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Aug 15, 2017 at 13:36 UTC | |
| |
Re: Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count
by kcott (Archbishop) on Aug 17, 2017 at 05:02 UTC | |
Re: Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count
by marto (Cardinal) on Aug 15, 2017 at 11:48 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 15, 2017 at 15:24 UTC |