in reply to Re^6: pissed off about functional programming
in thread pissed off about functional programming
You are right that Perl lacks (or discourages) certain things from other languages, so maybe the feature-rich distinction isn't so important as the TIMTOWDI distinction. Many languages try to do everything with one or two key tools. Because Perl borrows tools from so many other languages, I still question whether it has its own accent.
Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
You can look unfamiliar with a language without having another language's accent. Of the things you list, throwing things in a hash might be one that is distinctively Perl-tinged — something that might make someone who reviews your code say, "You're trying to write Perl in Mumble!"
Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^8: pissed off about functional programming
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Apr 26, 2005 at 12:46 UTC | |
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Apr 26, 2005 at 12:54 UTC | |
Re^8: pissed off about functional programming
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 26, 2005 at 15:34 UTC |
In Section
Meditations