in reply to Re: Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
in thread Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
I mean absolutely no derision as I point this out, but I do find humor in the situation: You're using features which were introduced later than 5.005_03 to detect whether or not the interpretter is later than 5.005_03. Neither $^V nor v-strings exist in 5.005_03.
You probably want your conditional to be:
It works under 5.5 and under 5.6/5.8 as well. I know I've got to be one of the few monks around here that still lives in 5.005_03.if ($] and $] < 5.006)
------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jun 30, 2005 at 17:02 UTC | |
by etcshadow (Priest) on Jun 30, 2005 at 18:50 UTC | |
Re^3: Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
by Tanalis (Curate) on Jun 30, 2005 at 15:14 UTC | |
by ambrus (Abbot) on Jun 30, 2005 at 16:19 UTC | |
Re^3: Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
by cosmicperl (Chaplain) on Jun 30, 2005 at 14:37 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jun 30, 2005 at 17:06 UTC | |
Re^3: Problems with 'our' definition with perl 5.00503
by cosmicperl (Chaplain) on Jun 30, 2005 at 16:25 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom