Re: RE (tilly) 1: Schwartzian Transform

But let us use a fake notation where |> means "pipe to",
perl v6.0?

Comment on Re: RE (tilly) 1: Schwartzian Transform

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 3: Schwartzian Transform by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 04, 2001 at 22:16 UTC
I have no idea if it is under consideration. Probably not. I suggested it on p5p once to decidedly mixed reviews. I note that in many other languages similar algorithms are naturally coded as chained method calls, and that winds up reading left to right...	[reply]
(tye)Re: Schwartzian Transform by tye (Sage) on Jan 05, 2001 at 00:26 UTC
I advocated a list-dereference syntax to fairly positive reviews in p5p, but I doubt anyone will find the tuits to actually implement it. It would allow an entire list to be passed to a method, like map, or to dereference multi-dimensional slices of nested data structures: `@3dSlice= $ref->@==>{qw(a b c)}==>[1..5]; $obj->GetAttribs()==>Stringify()==>Dump();` [download] The choice of token was not solidified. (Or was your `\|>` mentioned in that thread as well?) - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Re: RE (tilly) 1: Schwartzian Transform by meonkeys (Chaplain) on Aug 11, 2003 at 07:17 UTC
perl v6.0? yep! Guess they liked '`==>`'. --- "A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack."	[reply]