http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=621314

hi,
The site is very slow in 90% of the cases for me for some reason, can you confirm ?
When I click between the links on the top right sometimes it is in the range of 15 sec, sometime in the range of 30 sec.
wget -v perlmonks.org --12:22:39-- http://perlmonks.org/ => `index.html.2' ... 12:23:21 (97.07 KB/s) - `index.html.2' saved [65659]
The interesting thing is that when I debug it with firebug the total load time of the html and css :
http://perlmonks.org/css/common.css http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=204962
it says something in the range of 100-200ms. It seems that it stales for ~20sec and then fetches everything for ~150ms.
The network seems to be ok (97K/s).
ping perlmonks.org -s 1400 PING perlmonks.org (209.197.123.153) 1400(1428) bytes of data. 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=1 ttl=5 +1 time=107 ms 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=2 ttl=5 +1 time=106 ms 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=3 ttl=5 +1 time=105 ms 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=4 ttl=5 +1 time=108 ms 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=5 ttl=5 +1 time=106 ms 1408 bytes from perlmonks.pair.com (209.197.123.153): icmp_seq=6 ttl=5 +1 time=107 ms --- perlmonks.org ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 4999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 105.900/107.082/108.509/0.930 ms
I haven't done any tweaks on Firefox.
Do you experience slowdown or it is only me ?
10x

PS> hmm the Preview button was quick

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: site slow ?
by ysth (Canon) on Jun 14, 2007 at 23:18 UTC

      Probably, though different. I've had pair.com adjust the max number of httpd's Apache will try to create and that has meant that the web servers aren't having to be rebooted much.

      But each web server varies between being unusually fast to respond to being extremely slow to respond.

      We have lots of data but I haven't found enough time digging through it to narrow down the cause. Though the performance of the two servers is rarely correlated so the problem probably isn't database-related.

      - tye