in reply to Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
in thread What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
~> is less characters, but is more travel. I like ->> because it's the same input as -> but with the last character repeated.
~> also looks too similar to -> on some fonts at a glance, so ->> has the advantage of being shaped differently. Of course it does have the disadvantage that a junior might think it's a typo and 'fix' it.
~> also looks too similar to -> on some fonts at a glance, so ->> has the advantage of being shaped differently. Of course it does have the disadvantage that a junior might think it's a typo and 'fix' it.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by cavac (Parson) on Jun 17, 2012 at 18:23 UTC |
In Section
Past Polls