in reply to Re: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
Many thanks, that explains a lot. :)
I'd rather call this an SQL abstraction.
It's much like SQL::Abstract and allows to cover (almost?) all semantics of SQL queries.
But yeah, like I said I'm strongly associating ORM to "Active Records" and the resulting limitations.
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery