in reply to Re^2: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
The fundamental definition of an ORM I found is to hold data model inside an object system which is made persistent with a DB server.
That means mapping in one direction and the "data language" is limited to the semantics of the OOP model.
But that's a one way street.
Like with "Active Record".
> I thought several ORM frameworks are capable of that?
That would surprise me.
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|Replies are listed 'Best First'.|
Re^4: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by haukex (Bishop) on Jun 06, 2021 at 15:40 UTC
by LanX (Sage) on Jun 06, 2021 at 16:13 UTC