When did you start to notice that you were getting good?

I wouldn't put it that way, because it implies that there is a clear boundary dividing the before and after "getting good." I don't think it's like that; there's always stuff to learn, and there's always stuff to get better at.

I look at Perl code that I wrote 1, 2, 5 years ago, for example, and I definitely see a pattern of improvement, but I can't point to a watershed moment after which my programming "got good".

BTW, I read the docs all the time. I doubt I'll ever know Perl well enough to be able to make do without reading the docs this often.

the lowliest monk


In reply to Re: Reading the manual and knowing if you are getting good by tlm
in thread Reading the manual and knowing if you are getting good by ghenry

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":