I get where you are trying to go with this, but I do not think that it is applicable.

In the context of the considered post that started this thread, the word was used either:

  1. entirely on it's own;
  2. or in conjunction with the phrase "I laughed, I cried, I ...".

So none of the extra qualifications, connotations or implications that you cite apply.

I do not think that there is any rational explanation for why the 6-letter words is deemed "offensive", but the 9-letter word not, in this context. At best, the offendees are showing a marked lack of discrimination; bordering upon petulance. At worst, they are attempting to foist their will, sensabilities and morality upon the rest of us.

And the latter is one of the few things that I do find offensive.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

In reply to Re^6: Consideration for obscenity by BrowserUk
in thread Consideration for obscenity by ptum

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":