Is there anything in particular about the Test:: suite of modules that you don't like - or do you want to say that no test suite will be appropriate in 100% cases?

You've both missed my point, and made it exactly with your assumption that the only way to construct a test suite is to use Test::*.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

In reply to Re^2: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut. by BrowserUk
in thread Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut. by BrowserUk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":