in reply to TMTOWTDI... and most of them are wrong
Nice post, if for nothing else than making me think about the topic at hand. I think there's a lot of intuitive appeal to the logic that scary, interesting, and clever code is a detriment to code reuse. But I also think CPAN's success is a testament to that idea being a bit off base.
I won't pretend that I can explain why, but people have been posting idiomatic, obfuscatory, excessively clever, and even downright bad code to CPAN for a long time; yet it still seems to work out pretty well. People contribute. People reuse. The net effect seems to be positive, and a lot of good stuff emerges from the chaos.
|Replies are listed 'Best First'.|
Re^2: TMTOWTDI... and most of them are wrong
by Zaxo (Archbishop) on Jun 27, 2005 at 05:46 UTC