in reply to Re: Stupid, but fun, ideas in testing
in thread Stupid, but fun, ideas in testing
It doesn't on it's own, it runs the tests in whatever test classes you have loaded. So if you have two test classes named App::Test::Foo and App::Test::Bar, then you can run them together...
use App::Test::Foo; use App::Test::Bar; Test::Class->runtests;
In this case they will not be run independently, they will be run in the same interpreter, and I don't think the order they get run in (App::Test::Foo first or App::Test::Bar first) is defined.
If you want them to run independently, you still have to create independent test scripts for them...
# Foo.t use App::Test::Foo; Test::Class->runtests; # Bar.t use App::Test::Bar; Test::Class->runtests;
Generally I don't think of Test::Class as a replacement for traditional *.t, but as a helper for them. It's a great help if you have things like unit tests where you have to setup fixtures first and tear them down after the testing, or if you have a bunch of similar classes that need to have their common features tested as well as their own individual unit tests.
|We're not surrounded, we're in a target-rich environment!|