Re^5: Removing CODE slot in typeglob / Reversing "use subs ...;"

It's the $false playing tricks again.

Yeah. Evaling a conditional on an undefined variable in the absence of strict, is a weird way to test if something is allowed under strict.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^5: Removing CODE slot in typeglob / Reversing "use subs ...;"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Removing CODE slot in typeglob / Reversing "use subs ...;" by lodin (Hermit) on Jan 03, 2008 at 19:24 UTC
Doh! I'm so used to strict I didn't even think about that it's strict that makes barewords fatal. The root node is updated to have a (hopefully) correct test. No code is too short for `strict` ... lodin	[reply] [d/l]