in reply to Sad news

This is horrible.
Does it have to be like that? Not really:
I blame and will the f.+ing pharmaceutical industry, but who cares?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Sad news
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 11, 2009 at 18:20 UTC
    If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. confirms that his technology has never been independently verified by anyone, that he claimed to be able to see viruses with microscopes that were physically incapable of seeing those viruses, and that quite a few people with curable diseases have died while using his device instead of traditional medicine.

    Yes, I know you probably think that I am a dupe of the traditional medical industry. But I still suggest that you read and think about What do you know, and how do you know that you know it?. At the least it might help you to understand why others are not likely to be convinced by what you said.

Re^2: Sad news
by Anomynous Monk (Scribe) on Jan 11, 2009 at 23:32 UTC
    the f.+ing pharmaceutical industry
    Wait, who brought up viagra, etc.?

    I too will miss him.

Re^2: Sad news
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 17, 2009 at 10:09 UTC
    If that guy was alive today I'd go and kick his ass, he's worse than a psychic surgeon. Frauds need to be hung by their feet.