in reply to Re^3: partition of an array
in thread partition of an array

No, neither of us should do that. :-) I should have just well enough alone with my brute force solution.

I tested my "quick" version with every data set in this thread and more; and managed to miss sequences like: 550, 450, 360, 340, 300. Oh well, I'll be more perspicacious tomorrow. Ha!

Be well,
rir