Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour

The word that I keep seeing left out of these replies is 'precedence'. It looks to me like there is confusion between my ($x if undef); and (my $x) if undef; It looks to me like you are expecting the latter and getting the former. I suspect 'if' is being evaluated as an operator, so it gets a higher precedence than the 'my' function, and confusion results. Or I could be completely wrong.

Comment on Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour by tachyon (Chancellor) on Jul 13, 2001 at 06:57 UTC
Hi I think this clarifies the situation. $x is definitely lexically scoped. Run this as in then uncomment the use strict. `# use strict; sub foo { my $x if 0; return ++$x; } for (1..7){ print foo(); print "($x)"; };` [download] cheers tachyon s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour by HyperZonk (Friar) on Jul 12, 2001 at 22:19 UTC
Actually, the `if` being evaluated first is exactly what we would want in any case. You are missing the implication of the behavior, however. The variable, besides being localized which is unexpected (until one realizes that data scoping is done at compile-time in this case), also becomes static; that is, it retains its value between calls, which is unexpected behavior for a local via `my` variable. See iakobski's reply in this thread for more details.	[reply] [d/l] [select]