What you describe is stone age democracy, where a "majority" thinks it can rewrite fundamental rules.

One symptom in real life is calling judges "enemies of the state", the next throwing opposition into jail.

We here follow rules, it doesn't matter how many monks like or dislike a Perl related technology, they are free to discuss, as long as they follow the rules.

And this will never change, because admins here are chosen not elected.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!

Update: IMO they'd rather stop maintaining the site, than accepting a change in fundamental rules.


In reply to Re^2: Consensus-driven site policy changes by LanX
in thread Think Perl 6 (new book) by pvaldes

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":