I wrote a really witty rejoinder to this on a punchcard, but I can't seem to find a reader for it on any of my machines . . .

The problem is not that it uses whitespace, it's that the amount of whitespace has semantic meaning. Yes a Makefile uses whitespace, but so long as there's one initial tab it doesn't make any difference what amount of additional whitespace precedes the command. And I can't think of any shell where the amount of whitespace makes a syntactic difference.

No one's saying you can't use the amount of whitespace as a semantically significant portion of your programming language, but the fact that pretty much no one does any more might mean something.

Update: OOOOH, you caught me AM. Thanks for showing the one corner case that proves that Perl is just as guilty. I'll have to go delete the part where I said Perl was completely wartless itself.

--
We're looking for people in ATL


In reply to Re^2: Perl fan being tempted with Python by Fletch
in thread Perl fan being tempted with Python by jeyroz

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":