Still, that raises a question, in my feeble brain: NTC says:
Janitors only honor a consideration when it is consistent with site policy and doesn't conflict with their own judgement, regardless of how many 'edit' votes it has. When the appropriateness of a consideration is less clear, patience is preferred over haste.
...which led this non-janitor to believe janitors have some discretion about the rule you cite.
And if I misunderstood the rule, does that not mean the (potential) loss of XP for an actual service is -- in your earlier (and well-considered) phrase, "noise that should be avoided?"
In reply to Re^5: History now influences voting (judgement)
by ww
in thread History now influences voting
by tye
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |