in reply to Re: The future of mod_perl
in thread The future of mod_perl

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The future of mod_perl
by Fletch (Chancellor) on Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20 UTC

    All three have been arguing from an incorrect premise ("mod_perl is just for content generation", "mod_perl is just something to avoid CGI fork overhead"); two of those having been posted after the incorrectness of the premise was pointed out. The last one acknowledges that the incorrectness of its premise has been noted, and then goes on to again argue that mod_perl's not needed any more because it's just something used to avoid a CGI fork . . .

    At no point were any of them close to a rational thought or any sort of worthwhile contribution to this or any other discussion. Everyone reading this thread is now dumber for having read them. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</Billy Maddison>

    The cake is a lie.
    The cake is a lie.
    The cake is a lie.

Re^3: The future of mod_perl
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 25, 2021 at 02:51 UTC
    So, does anyone actually have anything to say, that "the powers that be here" will not immediately choose to exterminate?

    Yes, everyone but you has something to say that isn't utter garbage.