Yes... The problem is my orange is not performing well, so I'm switching to an apple. The question is: which apple should I use?

The code, in this case, does (or rather will, if I go forward with it) indeed read from the database as that is how it will populate the data structure I am using. The point is, this "server" would be persistent. So each request would only need to execute the code I am timing (and to fetch any data not yet in its cache or which is "dirty".

I wanted to avoid getting into the SQL specifics, because I use some Postgres-specific stuff which is not immediately apparent. My query is something like:
SELECT count(*) as count,category.category,nlevel(category.category) A +S level, subpath(category.category,0,nlevel(category.category)-1) as parent, category.head_title, category.cat_title, category.subcat_title FROM da +ta, category WHERE data.category <@ category.category GROUP BY category.category, category.head_title, category.cat_title, c +ategory.subcat_title
The category table looks like:
Table "category" Column | Type --------------+------------------- head_title | character varying cat_title | character varying subcat_title | character varying category | ltree
The data table looks like:
Table "data" Column | Type + +---------------------------------------------- id | integer category | ltree[]
... there are other columns here but these are the ones relevant to the query.

- dEvNuL

In reply to Re^2: Architectural question... by devnul
in thread Architectural question... by devnul

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":