in reply to Re^17: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
in thread ref to read-only alias ... why?
There was code written to specifically perform this effect. By definition, the effect must be intentional.
If it were true, why then threaded and non-threaded perl give different results in \ $_ ? Was that also intentional? Even if it was, that's bad intention to me, and bad design. A bug, basically.
|Replies are listed 'Best First'.|
Re^19: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
by ikegami (Pope) on Jan 09, 2012 at 18:15 UTC