http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1187140

cbeckley has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

One of the answers to Why does ‘keys’ need a named hash? made me remember a question that's been bugging me for awhile.

duelafn replied with

return keys %{ {map { $_ => 1 } @_} };

I've been using this syntax and have accepted it as idiomatic Perl, however, what I don't get is, why the curly braces? And why two pairs of them? Is there a reference dereference happening?

Given this:

say Dumper(\%{ {map { $_ => 'fish' } qw(one two red blue)} } ); ^ ^ ^ ^ |-|-----------------------------------------|-|
I get:
$VAR1 = { 'blue' => 'fish', 'one' => 'fish', 'red' => 'fish', 'two' => 'fish' };
If I remove the inner pair of indicated braces, I get
Ambiguous use of %{map{...}} resolved to %map{...}

So the inner pair is a code block. I'm not sure that clears anything up for me, unless I'm being thick ...
If I need to return an array, as opposed to a list or a hash, what would that syntax be?
So if I want this:

$VAR1 = [ 'one', 'fish', 'two', 'fish', 'red', 'fish', 'blue', 'fish' ];
How do I do it?

say Dumper(\@{ {map { $_ => 'fish' } qw(one two red blue)} } );
produces
Not an ARRAY reference
Which implies this is not a dereferencing thing ... unless of course I'm doing it wrong.

Thanks,
cbeckley