http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=275893


in reply to Acme::Current

Maybe this defeats the module's purpose, but the plug for Stonehenge consulting should be removed from the docs. CPAN is not a billboard, and posting an advertisement/module that shows up as "new" every day is just offensive.

/s

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Acme::Current
by Koschei (Monk) on Aug 08, 2003 at 07:19 UTC
    On the other hand, it's more a recommendation against using Stonehenge given the rubbishness of Acme::Current.

      I don't know about your experiences, but Acme::Current works as designed and as advertised. It might not be the best choice of module, but considering an Acme module as "best choice" seems weird anyway.

      In my eyes, it reflects badly on the sense of humour and sense of timing - a joke that was funny once, when you did not know it, is not necessarily funny again, when you get it told the twentieth time, just in case there was anybody present that didn't know it yet. But sense of humour and sense of timing aren't what I'd consider paramount when deciding on a consulting service. Except maybe I would decree a no-joke policy for the consultants.

      perl -MHTTP::Daemon -MHTTP::Response -MLWP::Simple -e ' ; # The $d = new HTTP::Daemon and fork and getprint $d->url and exit;#spider ($c = $d->accept())->get_request(); $c->send_response( new #in the HTTP::Response(200,$_,$_,qq(Just another Perl hacker\n))); ' # web