http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1170500


in reply to Re^4: CamelCase really that bad?
in thread CamelCase really that bad?

After spending a lot of time on research (maybe even 5 minutes), I couldn't actually remember/find a single module that uses any camel case. So I guess the standard is not to use it ;)

Follow the link provided and you can see a small sample

Also look at the list of core modules, FileHandle, FindBin, I18N::LangTags, Tie::Array, its all the SameCamel

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: CamelCase really that bad?
by zwon (Abbot) on Aug 27, 2016 at 20:05 UTC
    Those modules are not using camel case for methods at all. For package names there was no question from my side.
        Awesome, thank you! Without going through all the results and doing any actual counting I would say camelCase for methods is used about as much as CamelCase.
Re^6: CamelCase really that bad?
by dsheroh (Monsignor) on Aug 28, 2016 at 07:55 UTC
    Follow the link provided and you can see a small sample
    You mean the link to the wikipedia page which states that the standard in Perl is "Locally scoped variables and subroutine names are lowercase with infix underscores." and not camelCase?
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.