Re: Re: Professional Employees and Works for Hire

in reply to Re: Professional Employees and Works for Hire
in thread Professional Employees and Works for Hire

change the license to future releases of Perl: everybody else gets to go on using it for free, but Tilly's employer has to pay a fee. open source doesn't mean helpless. waive the fee if they agree to release Tilly's work.

Comment on Re: Re: Professional Employees and Works for Hire

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Professional Employees and Works for Hire by Anonymous Monk on Mar 21, 2002 at 16:40 UTC
This fails item 5 of the Open Source Definition.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Professional Employees and Works for Hire by dorko (Prior) on Mar 21, 2002 at 18:23 UTC
Yes, I think we all know that (at least in our hearts), and I don't think anyone would seriously try to implement that. But just saying it blows off a lot of steam, and to a certain extent, it's fun to talk about doing it. Cheers! Brent -- Yeah, I'm a Delt.	[reply]

In Section Meditations