in reply to Re^2: Jokes, ad-hominem attacks, and sensitivity
in thread Jokes, ad-hominem attacks, and sensitivity
A christian who is shocked or insulted by an insult, and even complaints about that insult, should start thinking about the strength of his faith. Is his faith so weak that it can be shocked that easily? Of so, on what is his faith based?
A true believer may be shocked, but does not complain in public about that shock. Instead, this believer seeks for the reason of this shock. Once he finds that reason, he thinks about it and tries to solve the problem, so the next time he is not shocked. If he wants to respond at all, he will then write about his quest for the reason of him being shocked and about the way he solved it.
Being shocked generally means that the believer did not think about his believe thoroughly enough. There are aspects of his faith that are taken for granted, that are plainly accepted for true.
A response that the believer is shocked by the insult is a confession of weakness. A response should include an answer to the one that insulted, in which the insult is proven wrong. If the faithful is not capable of such an answer, I seriously doubt the reason for his faith.
Yes, I am an atheist. I know many christians who believe in christ just because their parents and teachers and religious leaders told them to be. Christians who know hardly anything about their religious texts. Maybe they use their faith to add to their identity, just like a Perl Monk who proudly claims on his home node he is a faithful christian, to distinguish himself from less faithful monks (look, my car is bigger and better).
Should an insult remain unanswered? No, as I said, answer with a prove of the erroneousness of the insult. Not just by showing shock.
Wendy
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: Jokes, ad-hominem attacks, and sensitivity
by rodion (Chaplain) on Aug 23, 2006 at 14:05 UTC | |
by woolfy (Chaplain) on Aug 23, 2006 at 19:47 UTC | |
by rodion (Chaplain) on Aug 24, 2006 at 15:20 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 24, 2006 at 15:32 UTC | |
by rodion (Chaplain) on Aug 25, 2006 at 19:39 UTC | |
|