in reply to Better Inside-Out Objects :)
I've been puzzled by Inside-Out Objects. They've attracted a following, but they seem like a complicated, long-winded way of solving a problem that I don't have. You lose serialization. You lose some ease in debugging. And you gain what? Better support for data encapsulation? I can achieve the same--and I've seen a team achieve the same--with a coding guideline that says "don't peek or poke at someone else's internals unless it's really O.K." and the discipline to follow the guideline.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Better Inside-Out Objects :)
by xdg (Monsignor) on Oct 07, 2006 at 12:00 UTC | |
Re^2: Better Inside-Out Objects :)
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Oct 07, 2006 at 16:24 UTC | |
by dws (Chancellor) on Oct 07, 2006 at 16:32 UTC |
In Section
Meditations