Re: Duplicate content

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Duplicate content by jeffa (Bishop) on Jul 24, 2013 at 18:07 UTC
And it still should! And it looks like it still does. :) jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^2: Duplicate content by McA (Priest) on Jul 25, 2013 at 07:46 UTC
Hi, I was pretty sure that this didn't slip through. I was just not aware of the solution. IMHO it would be "nicer" to have a redirect stating exactly what it does: The content you're are looking for can be found at that URL. But probably there are other reasons which I don't know. Thank you for the insights. Best regards McA	[reply]
Re^3: Duplicate content by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Jul 25, 2013 at 12:35 UTC
By having two different domains (com/org), you are able to have one session logged in, and one anonymous. The session tokens are good for a single domain. If this is good or not is another debate that has been (and will be) had. --MidLifeXis	[reply]