Re^10: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Also, it seems like there is some disagreement about whether a "Perl" project (like RPerl) should be licensed under Artistic v1 or Artistic v2. Can you give me input on that please?

Comment on Re^10: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks by ysth (Canon) on Dec 05, 2013 at 07:20 UTC
If you are free to choose, that is, if you are not dependent on code that can't be relicensed, absolutely go for v2. -- A math joke: r = \| \|csc(θ)\|+\|sec(θ)\| \|-\| \|csc(θ)\|-\|sec(θ)\| \|	[reply]
Re^12: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks by Will_the_Chill (Pilgrim) on Dec 10, 2013 at 07:51 UTC
ysth, RPerl does specifically do #include "perl.h" to work correctly, I assume this means I am dependent on Artistic v1 code and thus can't use Artistic v2? Thanks, ~ Will	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks