Other readers: I know marto (in the sense of "many years of both being users of PMonks") and so I know that he cannot both be speaking with integrity and yet also be saying that there is no reason he knows of why anything should change. That's a shame. I like seeing people act and speak with integrity.
...
If I were a new reader (I am not, and not trying to deceive anyone about having been involved in PMonks for a long time myself, and having been involved in acrimony here) ...I can place myself (its a mental talent I have) in the head of a new reader, and as that new reader, I would (if I was wise) surmise that this group of heavily invested PMonks users believe that the site belongs to them much more than to anyone else.
...
Please relegate that sort of diatribe to your home node, where you denounce some of your fellow monks with all the integrity and talent you have to place yourself into someone else's head. Btw, stay out of mine.
perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'
| [reply]
[d/l] |
In the real world, grumblers like you often eventually do tire everyone and get their way, but I don't think it's gonna work here. Yes, there are a few that expressed their preference repeatedly (Well, there's you. That's about it.) and were downvoted severely, the general consensus was to keep AM and the thread deteriorated to a flamewar (you against the rest of the world). Said threads are a perfect reason to KEEP the anonymonk.
The only one in denial of disagreement is you.
Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.
| [reply] |
Thank you, perlmonks really needed the fertilizer | [reply] |
