Please consider addressing raiph in a more polite manner instead of shortening his name. Your current tone of choice is undesireable here.
Also, I don't think that your topic of choice really has a place here. You are just rehashing some long bygone statements. It seems to me that you are trying to drum up interest or drama surrounding Perl 6, or persons involved with Perl 6 , either for good or for bad. Your methods of choice are not appreciated.
If you have topics you want to talk about with raiph, please take it to personal messages or email. This (or, likely, any) public forum is not the place for your conversation.
| [reply] |
carlosdelrey wrote:
It's only a lie if it's deliberate, ralphie-boy.
Aside from the incredibly rude "ralphie-boy", you've made some strong accusations of Moritz trying to cover up bad behavior and by your own admission, those accusations were false. Strong claims require strong evidence and you provided none. By your reckoning, I can say all sorts of vile and nasty things about you and so long as I believe it, it's not a lie. If you squint, that's sort of true, but it doesn't mean your failure to provide any evidence to back up your accusations is acceptable.
So the only real thing I can take away here is that you're deliberately rude to other people and are prone to throwing around baseless accusations.
If you think the Perl 6 project isn't going anywhere, that's fine; you're not the only one in that camp. That means you should lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. Picking fights only makes you look bad.
| [reply] |
You know as well as I do that we both spent time looking for Jonathan admitting that he'd wanted to kill off Parrot for a long time.
Actually I didn't know. But that's interesting.
I've looked hard, real hard. I've found nothing supporting this claim about Jonathan or any of your other claims.
What about you? While most of your claims parrot unsubstantiated claims made over the years by chromatic, you've independently asserted them and searched for evidence to support them and failed to find anything. What's your explanation for there being no supporting evidence in the public record even though we've both looked for it?
("There is no way to finish P6 without leaving Parrot behind" isn't evidence of wrong-doing. It's just a common sense 2013 truism. If it's all you've got, then all you've got is lies.)
| [reply] |
