|The stupid question is the question not asked|
Re^3: A list assignment gotcha (Updated)by LanX (Cardinal)
|on Jul 30, 2020 at 14:48 UTC||Need Help??|
> A bit trickier than I originally thought.
I was about to update that one needs :lvalue and returning a tied scalar then.
Surprised you made it without tie , my last use case must have been different than. :)
> You can use [3, 2, 1] on the RHS, as well.
> on both the listifier and constructor.
Genius!!! that's how you avoided using Tie::Scalar! :)