![]() |
|
Welcome to the Monastery | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: Experimental warnings with given/whenby ikegami (Patriarch) |
on Dec 01, 2020 at 08:37 UTC ( #11124446=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
That could very well be part of it, but the main reason (in my mind) is the fact that the table treats two (stored as a number) differently than two (stored as a string). This leads to surprises/problems because the rest of Perl doesn't tend to distinguish how something is stored. This means the operator is broken-by-design.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|