Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Perl syntax checking without `perl -c`

by perlfan (Vicar)
on Dec 03, 2020 at 18:10 UTC ( #11124591=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl syntax checking without `perl -c`
in thread Perl syntax checking without `perl -c`

This is not "crude" and actually a good solution; that often times you definitely want things to fail if prerequisite modules are not found. And if you're requiring libs over a network mounted drive, you're gonna have a bad time.
  • Comment on Re^2: Perl syntax checking without `perl -c`

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl syntax checking without `perl -c`
by jo37 (Friar) on Dec 03, 2020 at 19:12 UTC

    I just can't understand why someone capable of giving such a valuable contribution disguises himself as the Anonymous Monk.

    Greetings,
    -jo

    $gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$
      Thanks for the kind words! Personally, I just don't like logging in. Websites still allowing anonymous posting (like PerlMonks and the SQLite forum) are like a breeze of fresh air to me. Ironically, I had to log in to post this because I kept getting "Tough beans" otherwise.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11124591]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2021-04-14 20:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?