Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Modern PerlMonks in Best Nodes

by Anonymous Monk
on Jan 19, 2025 at 09:47 UTC ( [id://11163739]=monkdiscuss: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Best Nodes lists Modern PerlMonks with 93 votes as best in categories from week till year. But it's not accessible permission denied, and unlikely to be new.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Modern PerlMonks in Best Nodes
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 20, 2025 at 04:24 UTC

    That's my bad. I created that node by cloning an existing tutorial (this one) and then I converted it to a alphafaqlet. It didn't occur to me that it would keep the rep of the source node. I will correct that.

      It's a curiousity -- but I get it. Sometimes you really do have to test in Production.

      Alex / talexb / Toronto

      For a long time, I had a link in my .sig going to Groklaw. I heard that as of December 2024, this link is dead. Still, thanks to PJ for all your work, we owe you so much. RIP Groklaw -- 2003 to 2013.

        Definitely let me know if you experience any loss of revenue as a result. X-D

Re: Modern PerlMonks in Best Nodes
by Corion (Patriarch) on Jan 19, 2025 at 11:24 UTC
      Modern PerlMonks belongs to the class:

        alphafaqlet

        • Authorized Readers: cabal(usergroup)
        • Authorized Creators: SiteDocClan(usergroup)
        • Authorized Updaters: default(owner)
        • Authorized Deleters: SiteDocClan(usergroup)

      Not sure what an alphafaqlet is, I suppose it's an sitefaqlet still under construction. Apparently this one was created on January 14th by jdporter

      But it's only readable for monks belonging to an admin group.

      And even us can't vote here.

      I doubt those nodes should even be considered for best nodes.

      Took a look into the code of best nodes, but wasn't able to identify a clause restricting the node's class .

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      Update

      I wouldn't mind if this was a temporary glitch, but a node with rep 93 will be listed for a year and provoke questions.

      A quick and dirty solution could be to just delete the reps in the DB.

      "Tough beans" here, too.

      Also, FYI, your link by node ID does a super search rather than linking to the node directly as I assume you intended. (For a direct link to the node, it looks like you need to change "node" to "node_id" in the URL.)

      That node is not accessible to me. I get the tough beans page.


      The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
Re: Modern PerlMonks in Best Nodes
by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jan 20, 2025 at 11:37 UTC

    Can't someone finally delete this nonsense? And perlmonks-dev.org to play around with would probably not be bad either. Together with the subterranean performance lately, it doesn't make a good impression - as it is at the moment.

      While code and data are inextricable, as they currently are, a proper, independent dev/staging environment is tricky or impossible.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://11163739]
Approved by LanX
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2025-02-09 15:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Which URL do you most often use to access this site?












    Results (96 votes). Check out past polls.