Re^4: Examples where XML::Simple is the optimal choice?


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks

Re^4: Examples where XML::Simple is the optimal choice?

by Preceptor (Deacon)

on Oct 23, 2015 at 21:53 UTC ( [id://1145818]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Examples where XML::Simple is the optimal choice?
in thread Examples where XML::Simple is the optimal choice?

Actually, thinking about it - one of the fundamental problems here, is that the transformation between XML to has breaks down - because what you have in XML is:

Nodes beneath the same parent with the same name
Ordered named nodes
Attributes - which logically would be a hash, but if they do, they contend with children

So with that in mind - you can craft XML that passes through XML::Simple painlessly by not doing any of those things:

<xml>
   <element>value</element>
   <another_element>a different value</another_element>
</xml>
[download]

The irony is though - if your XML is that simple, then you didn't need XML::SImple either:

    my %stuff = $xml =~ m/(\w+)>([^<]+)</g;
[download]

But as we know - it's a bad idea to parse XML with a regex - I think it's a bad idea to use XML::Simple for exactly the same reasons. (And you need to install it too)